Youngberg v. Romeo
457 U.S. 307 · Decided June 18, 1982 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
Youngberg v. Romeo was decided on June 18, 1982 unanimously (9–0). The Court vacated the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Due process, miscellaneous” in the Due Process area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 457 U.S. 307 · 102 S. Ct. 2452 · 73 L. Ed. 2d 28 · 1982 U.S. LEXIS 128
- Docket number
- 80-1429
- Decided
- June 18, 1982
- Argued
- January 11, 1982
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Vacated and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- Lewis F. Powell Jr.
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Due process, miscellaneous
- Issue area
- Due Process
- Legal provision
- Fourteenth Amendment (due process)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Concurrence | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Special concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority | |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Concurrence |
Full case caption
Youngberg, Superintendent, Pennhurst State School and Hospital, et al. v. Romeo, an Incompetent, by His Mother and Next Friend, Romeo
SCDB identifiers: case 1981-124, docket 1981-124-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Due process, miscellaneous”
- City of Mesquite v. Aladdin's Castle, Inc.
- Landon v. Plasencia
- Kolender v. LawsonLaw held unconstitutional
- Jones v. United States
- Board of Education of Paris Union School District No. 95 v. Vail
- California v. Trombetta
Cases on the same legal provision: Fourteenth Amendment (due process)
- Blum v. Yaretsky
- Asarco Inc. v. Idaho State Tax CommissionLaw held unconstitutional
- F. W. Woolworth Co. v. Taxation and Revenue Department of New MexicoLaw held unconstitutional
- Insurance Corporation of Ireland, Ltd. v. Compagnie Des Bauxites de Guinee
- Greene v. LindseyLaw held unconstitutional
- Santosky v. KramerLaw held unconstitutional
Same Term, same area (Due Process)
- Jago v. Van Curen
- Texaco, Inc. v. Short
- Smith v. Phillips
- City of Mesquite v. Aladdin's Castle, Inc.
- Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co.
- Schweiker v. McClure
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error