William Joseph Harris v. United States
536 U.S. 545 · Decided June 24, 2002 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
William Joseph Harris v. United States was decided on June 24, 2002 by a vote of 5–4. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Anthony M. Kennedy wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Jury trial right” in the Criminal Procedure area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 536 U.S. 545 · 122 S. Ct. 2406 · 153 L. Ed. 2d 524 · 2002 U.S. LEXIS 4652
- Docket number
- 00-10666
- Decided
- June 24, 2002
- Argued
- March 25, 2002
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 5–4
- Majority opinion
- Anthony M. Kennedy
- Opinion assigned by
- William H. Rehnquist
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Jury trial right
- Issue area
- Criminal Procedure
- Legal provision
- 18 U.S.C. § 924
- Type of law
- Infrequently litigated statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Dissent | |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Majority | |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice David H. Souter | Dissent | |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Dissent | |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
Full case caption
William Joseph Harris v. United States
SCDB identifiers: case 2001-076, docket 2001-076-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Jury trial right”
- Ray A. Lewis v. United States
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. and Althon Enterprises, Inc.
- Oregon v. Thomas Eugene Ice
- United States v. Jerry J. Nachtigal
- Guy Wooddell, Jr. v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers
- Deborah K. Johnson v. Tara Sheneva Williams
Cases on the same legal provision: 18 U.S.C. § 924
- Jaime Castillo v. United States
- Reginald Shepard v. United States
- United States v. Jacinto Rodriguez-Moreno
- Frank J. Muscarello v. United States
- Alphonso James, Jr. v. United States
- United States v. Miguel Gonzales
Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)
- United States v. Mark James Knights
- William Arthur Kelly v. South Carolina
- United States v. Ralph Arvizu
- United States v. Alphonso Vonn
- Walter Mickens, Jr. v. John Taylor
- United States v. Leonard CottonAltered precedent
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error