Reginald Shepard v. United States
544 U.S. 13 · Decided March 7, 2005 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Reginald Shepard v. United States was decided on March 7, 2005 by a vote of 5–3. The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice David H. Souter wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Statutory construction of criminal laws, sentencing guidelines” in the Criminal Procedure area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 544 U.S. 13 · 125 S. Ct. 1254 · 161 L. Ed. 2d 205 · 2005 U.S. LEXIS 2205
- Docket number
- 03-9168
- Decided
- March 7, 2005
- Argued
- November 8, 2004
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 5–3
- Majority opinion
- David H. Souter
- Opinion assigned by
- John Paul Stevens
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue area
- Criminal Procedure
- Legal provision
- 18 U.S.C. § 924
- Type of law
- Infrequently litigated statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Concurrence | |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Concurrence | |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Dissent | |
| Justice David H. Souter | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Concurrence | |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Dissent |
Did not participate: William H. Rehnquist.
Full case caption
Reginald Shepard v. United States
SCDB identifiers: case 2004-027, docket 2004-027-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Statutory construction of criminal laws, sentencing guidelines”
- United States v. Freddie J. BookerLaw held unconstitutional
- Ralph Howard Blakely, Jr. v. WashingtonLaw held unconstitutional
- Jeffrey Jerome Salinas v. United States
- Washington v. Arturo R. Recuenco
- John Cunningham v. CaliforniaLaw held unconstitutional
- Alphonso James, Jr. v. United States
Cases on the same legal provision: 18 U.S.C. § 924
- William Joseph Harris v. United States
- Michael A. Watson v. United States
- Larry Begay v. United States
- Jaime Castillo v. United States
- United States v. Jacinto Rodriguez-Moreno
- Frank J. Muscarello v. United States
Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)
- Laroyce Lathair Smith v. Texas
- Gerald Devenpeck v. Jerome Anthony Alford
- Florida v. Joe Elton Nixon
- David Whitfield v. United States
- United States v. Freddie J. BookerLaw held unconstitutional
- Illinois v. Roy I. Caballes
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error