Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory
431 U.S. 471 · Decided May 31, 1977 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory was decided on May 31, 1977 unanimously (8–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice Harry A. Blackmun wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Poverty law, statutory welfare benefits” in the Civil Rights area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 431 U.S. 471 · 97 S. Ct. 1898 · 52 L. Ed. 2d 513 · 1977 U.S. LEXIS 97
- Docket number
- 75-1707
- Decided
- May 31, 1977
- Argued
- February 28, 1977
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 8–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- Harry A. Blackmun
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- Poverty law, statutory welfare benefits
- Issue area
- Civil Rights
- Legal provision
- Article VI, Section 2 (supremacy clause)
- Type of law
- Constitution
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority |
Did not participate: William H. Rehnquist.
Full case caption
Ohio Bureau of Employment Services et al. v. Hodory
SCDB identifiers: case 1976-116, docket 1976-116-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Poverty law, statutory welfare benefits”
- Batterton v. Francis
- Maher v. Doe
- Quern v. Mandley
- Youakim v. Miller
- Miller v. Youakim
- Alexander v. United States Department of Housing and Urban Development
Cases on the same legal provision: Article VI, Section 2 (supremacy clause)
- United States v. County of Fresno
- General Atomic Co. v. Felter
- De Canas v. Bica
- Antoine et Ux. v. Washington
- United States v. New Mexico
- Toll v. Moreno
Same Term, same area (Civil Rights)
- Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Bagamasbad
- General Electric Co. v. Gilbert
- Mathews v. de Castro
- Craig v. BorenAltered precedentLaw held unconstitutional
- International Union of Electrical v. Robbins & Myers, Inc.
- Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error