United States v. Agurs
427 U.S. 97 · Decided June 24, 1976 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
United States v. Agurs was decided on June 24, 1976 by a vote of 7–2. The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice John Paul Stevens wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Due process, miscellaneous” in the Due Process area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 427 U.S. 97 · 96 S. Ct. 2392 · 49 L. Ed. 2d 342 · 1976 U.S. LEXIS 72
- Docket number
- 75-491
- Decided
- June 24, 1976
- Argued
- April 28, 1976
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 7–2
- Majority opinion
- John Paul Stevens
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Due process, miscellaneous
- Issue area
- Due Process
- Legal provision
- Fifth Amendment (due process)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Dissent | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
Full case caption
United States v. Agurs
SCDB identifiers: case 1975-147, docket 1975-147-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Due process, miscellaneous”
- North v. Russell
- Usery v. Turner Elkhorn Mining Co.
- Tennessee v. Dunlap
- United States v. Powell
- Rose v. Locke
- Patterson v. New York
Cases on the same legal provision: Fifth Amendment (due process)
- Mathews v. Diaz
- Hampton v. Mow Sun WongLaw held unconstitutional
- Mathews v. Eldridge
- Moody v. Daggett
- Marks v. United States
- Schlesinger v. Ballard
Same Term, same area (Due Process)
- Rose v. Locke
- United States v. Powell
- Laing v. United States
- Alamo Land & Cattle Co., Inc. v. Arizona Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Shapiro et Ux.
- Baxter v. Palmigiano
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error