Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Shapiro et Ux.
424 U.S. 614 · Decided March 8, 1976 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Shapiro et Ux. was decided on March 8, 1976 by a vote of 6–2. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Byron R. White wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Due process, hearing or notice” in the Due Process area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 424 U.S. 614 · 96 S. Ct. 1062 · 47 L. Ed. 2d 278 · 1976 U.S. LEXIS 137
- Docket number
- 74-744
- Decided
- March 8, 1976
- Argued
- November 5, 1975
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 6–2
- Majority opinion
- Byron R. White
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Due process, hearing or notice
- Issue area
- Due Process
- Legal provision
- Internal Revenue Code
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Dissent |
Did not participate: John Paul Stevens.
Full case caption
Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Shapiro et Ux.
SCDB identifiers: case 1975-050, docket 1975-050-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Due process, hearing or notice”
- Laing v. United States
- Goss v. LopezLaw held unconstitutional
- Dixon v. Love
- Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co.
- Smith v. Organization of Foster Families for Equality & Reform
- Dillard v. Industrial Commission of Virginia
Cases on the same legal provision: Internal Revenue Code
- United States v. Pomponio
- United States v. Foster Lumber Co., Inc.
- Ivan Allen Co. v. United States
- Phelps v. United States
- Don E. Williams Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
- United States v. Bisceglia
Same Term, same area (Due Process)
- Rose v. Locke
- United States v. Powell
- Laing v. United States
- Alamo Land & Cattle Co., Inc. v. Arizona Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- Baxter v. Palmigiano
- Tennessee v. Dunlap
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error