Alamo Land & Cattle Co., Inc. v. Arizona Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
424 U.S. 295 · Decided February 24, 1976 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
Alamo Land & Cattle Co., Inc. v. Arizona Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit was decided on February 24, 1976 by a vote of 6–2. The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Harry A. Blackmun wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Due process, takings clause” in the Due Process area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 424 U.S. 295 · 96 S. Ct. 910 · 47 L. Ed. 2d 1 · 1976 U.S. LEXIS 23
- Docket number
- 74-125
- Decided
- February 24, 1976
- Argued
- October 14, 1975
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 6–2
- Majority opinion
- Harry A. Blackmun
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Due process, takings clause
- Issue area
- Due Process
- Legal provision
- Fifth Amendment (takings clause)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Dissent | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority |
Did not participate: John Paul Stevens.
Full case caption
Alamo Land & Cattle Co., Inc. v. Arizona Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
SCDB identifiers: case 1975-034, docket 1975-034-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Due process, takings clause”
- Blanchette v. Connecticut General Insurance Corp.
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York City
- Dean v. Gadsden Times Publishing Corp.
- United States v. Bodcaw Co.
- Leo Sheep Co. v. United States
- Almota Farmers Elevator & Warehouse Co. v. United States
Cases on the same legal provision: Fifth Amendment (takings clause)
- Gurley v. Rhoden
- City of Pittsburgh v. Alco Parking Corp.
- United States v. Fuller et Ux.
- Agins et Ux. v. City of Tiburon
- United States v. Grand River Dam Authority
- General Box Co. v. United States
Same Term, same area (Due Process)
- Rose v. Locke
- United States v. Powell
- Laing v. United States
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Shapiro et Ux.
- Baxter v. Palmigiano
- Tennessee v. Dunlap
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error