Schlesinger v. Ballard
419 U.S. 498 · Decided January 15, 1975 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Schlesinger v. Ballard was decided on January 15, 1975 by a vote of 5–4. The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice Potter Stewart wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Sex discrimination (excluding employment)” in the Civil Rights area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 419 U.S. 498 · 95 S. Ct. 572 · 42 L. Ed. 2d 610 · 1975 U.S. LEXIS 22
- Docket number
- 73-776
- Decided
- January 15, 1975
- Argued
- October 15, 1974
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 5–4
- Majority opinion
- Potter Stewart
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- Sex discrimination (excluding employment)
- Issue area
- Civil Rights
- Legal provision
- Fifth Amendment (due process)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William O. Douglas | Dissent | |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Byron R. White | Dissent | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Dissent | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority |
Full case caption
Schlesinger, Secretary of Defense, et al. v. Ballard
SCDB identifiers: case 1974-024, docket 1974-024-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Sex discrimination (excluding employment)”
- Taylor v. LouisianaAltered precedentLaw held unconstitutional
- Weinberger v. WiesenfeldLaw held unconstitutional
- Stanton v. StantonLaw held unconstitutional
- Kahn v. Shevin
- Frontiero et Vir v. RichardsonLaw held unconstitutional
- Mathews v. de Castro
Cases on the same legal provision: Fifth Amendment (due process)
- Secretary of the Navy v. Avrech
- Parker v. Levy
- Arnett v. Kennedy
- United States v. Powell
- Marshall v. United States
- Mathews v. Eldridge
Same Term, same area (Civil Rights)
- Saxbe v. Bustos
- Schick v. Reed
- Sosna v. Iowa
- Taylor v. LouisianaAltered precedentLaw held unconstitutional
- United States v. Mazurie
- North Georgia Finishing, Inc. v. Di-Chem, Inc.Law held unconstitutional
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error