United Building & Construction Trades Council of Camden County and Vicinity v. Mayor and Council of the City of Camden
465 U.S. 208 · Decided February 21, 1984 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
United Building & Construction Trades Council of Camden County and Vicinity v. Mayor and Council of the City of Camden was decided on February 21, 1984 by a vote of 8–1. The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice William H. Rehnquist wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Residency requirements” in the Civil Rights area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 465 U.S. 208 · 104 S. Ct. 1020 · 79 L. Ed. 2d 249 · 1984 U.S. LEXIS 26
- Docket number
- 81-2110
- Decided
- February 21, 1984
- Argued
- November 28, 1983
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 8–1
- Majority opinion
- William H. Rehnquist
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- Residency requirements
- Issue area
- Civil Rights
- Legal provision
- Article IV, Section 2, Paragraph 1 (privileges and immunities clause)
- Type of law
- Constitution
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority | |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority |
Full case caption
United Building & Construction Trades Council of Camden County and Vicinity v. Mayor and Council of the City of Camden et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1983-032, docket 1983-032-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Residency requirements”
- Martinez v. Bynum
- Supreme Court of New Hampshire v. PiperLaw held unconstitutional
- Hooper v. Bernalillo County AssessorLaw held unconstitutional
- Zobel et Ux. v. WilliamsLaw held unconstitutional
- Attorney General of New York v. Soto-LopezLaw held unconstitutional
- Frazier v. Heebe
Cases on the same legal provision: Article IV, Section 2, Paragraph 1 (privileges and immunities clause)
- Jones v. Helms
- Austin v. New HampshireLaw held unconstitutional
- Christopher H. Lunding v. New York Tax Appeals TribunalLaw held unconstitutional
- New York v. O'Neill
- Mullaney v. AndersonLaw held unconstitutional
- Missouri ex Rel. Southern Railway Co. v. Mayfield
Same Term, same area (Civil Rights)
- Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Phinpathya
- Migra v. Warren City School District Board of Education
- McCain v. Lybrand
- Solem v. Bartlett
- Consolidated Rail Corporation v. Darrone
- Grove City College v. Bell
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error