Christopher H. Lunding v. New York Tax Appeals Tribunal
522 U.S. 287 · Decided January 21, 1998 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
Christopher H. Lunding v. New York Tax Appeals Tribunal was decided on January 21, 1998 by a vote of 6–3. The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Sandra Day O'Connor wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “State or local government tax” in the Economic Activity area. SCDB records that the Court declared a state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision unconstitutional.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 522 U.S. 287 · 118 S. Ct. 766 · 139 L. Ed. 2d 717 · 1998 U.S. LEXIS 637
- Docket number
- 96-1462
- Decided
- January 21, 1998
- Argued
- November 5, 1997
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 6–3
- Majority opinion
- Sandra Day O'Connor
- Opinion assigned by
- John Paul Stevens
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- State or local government tax
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Article IV, Section 2, Paragraph 1 (privileges and immunities clause)
- Type of law
- Constitution
- Held unconstitutional
- A state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Dissent | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority | |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Majority | |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Dissent | |
| Justice David H. Souter | Majority | |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Majority | |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Majority |
Full case caption
Christopher H. Lunding, et Ux. v. New York Tax Appeals Tribunal et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1997-019, docket 1997-019-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “State or local government tax”
- Newsweek, Inc. v. Florida Department of Revenue
- Camps Newfound/owatonna, Inc. v. Town of HarrisonLaw held unconstitutional
- General Motors Corporation v. Roger W. Tracy
- South Central Bell Telephone Company v. AlabamaLaw held unconstitutional
- Fulton Corporation v. Janice H. FaulknerAltered precedentLaw held unconstitutional
- Hunt-Wesson, Inc. v. Franchise Tax Board of CaliforniaLaw held unconstitutional
Cases on the same legal provision: Article IV, Section 2, Paragraph 1 (privileges and immunities clause)
- Barnard v. ThorstennLaw held unconstitutional
- Supreme Court of Virginia v. FriedmanLaw held unconstitutional
- Supreme Court of New Hampshire v. PiperLaw held unconstitutional
- United Building & Construction Trades Council of Camden County and Vicinity v. Mayor and Council of the City of Camden
- Jones v. Helms
- Terk v. Gordon
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- State Oil Company v. Barkat U. Khan and Khan & Associates, Inc.Altered precedent
- Bay Area Laundry and Dry Cleaning Pension Trust Fund v. Ferbar Corporation of California, Inc.
- Fidelity Financial Services, Inc. v. Richard V Fink
- Newsweek, Inc. v. Florida Department of Revenue
- National Credit Union Administration v. First National Bank & Trust Co.
- Daniel Bogan and Marilyn Roderick v. Janet Scott-Harris
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error