Martinez v. Bynum
461 U.S. 321 · Decided May 2, 1983 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Martinez v. Bynum was decided on May 2, 1983 by a vote of 8–1. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Residency requirements” in the Civil Rights area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 461 U.S. 321 · 103 S. Ct. 1838 · 75 L. Ed. 2d 879 · 1983 U.S. LEXIS 158
- Docket number
- 81-857
- Decided
- May 2, 1983
- Argued
- January 10, 1983
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 8–1
- Majority opinion
- Lewis F. Powell Jr.
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Residency requirements
- Issue area
- Civil Rights
- Legal provision
- Fourteenth Amendment (equal protection)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority | |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority |
Full case caption
Martinez, as Next Friend of Morales v. Bynum, Texas Commissioner of Education, et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1982-073, docket 1982-073-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Residency requirements”
- United Building & Construction Trades Council of Camden County and Vicinity v. Mayor and Council of the City of Camden
- Zobel et Ux. v. WilliamsLaw held unconstitutional
- Supreme Court of New Hampshire v. PiperLaw held unconstitutional
- Hooper v. Bernalillo County AssessorLaw held unconstitutional
- Attorney General of New York v. Soto-LopezLaw held unconstitutional
- Frazier v. Heebe
Cases on the same legal provision: Fourteenth Amendment (equal protection)
- Bearden v. Georgia
- Pickett v. BrownLaw held unconstitutional
- Exxon Corp. v. Eagerton
- Brown v. Thomson
- Lehr v. Robertson
- Rogers v. LodgeLaw held unconstitutional
Same Term, same area (Civil Rights)
- Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Miranda
- City of Port Arthur v. United States
- City of Lockhart v. United States
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Wyoming
- Briscoe v. Lahue
- Arizona v. California
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error