Austin v. New Hampshire
420 U.S. 656 · Decided March 19, 1975 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
Austin v. New Hampshire was decided on March 19, 1975 by a vote of 7–1. The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice Thurgood Marshall wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “State or local government tax” in the Economic Activity area. SCDB records that the Court declared a state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision unconstitutional.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 420 U.S. 656 · 95 S. Ct. 1191 · 43 L. Ed. 2d 530 · 1975 U.S. LEXIS 106
- Docket number
- 73-2060
- Decided
- March 19, 1975
- Argued
- January 15, 1975
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 7–1
- Majority opinion
- Thurgood Marshall
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- State or local government tax
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Article IV, Section 2, Paragraph 1 (privileges and immunities clause)
- Type of law
- Constitution
- Held unconstitutional
- A state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority |
Did not participate: William O. Douglas.
Full case caption
Austin et al. v. New Hampshire et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1974-071, docket 1974-071-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “State or local government tax”
- Colonial Pipeline Co. v. Traigle
- Gurley v. Rhoden
- Standard Pressed Steel Co. v. Department of Revenue of Washington
- City of Pittsburgh v. Alco Parking Corp.
- Michelin Tire Corp. v. WagesAltered precedent
- Kosydar v. National Cash Register Co.
Cases on the same legal provision: Article IV, Section 2, Paragraph 1 (privileges and immunities clause)
- Baldwin v. Fish and Game Commission of Montana
- Terk v. Gordon
- Jones v. Helms
- United Building & Construction Trades Council of Camden County and Vicinity v. Mayor and Council of the City of Camden
- Supreme Court of New Hampshire v. PiperLaw held unconstitutional
- Supreme Court of Virginia v. FriedmanLaw held unconstitutional
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. Copp Paving Co., Inc.
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.
- Kelley v. Southern Pacific Co.
- Standard Pressed Steel Co. v. Department of Revenue of Washington
- Train v. City of New York
- Train v. Campaign Clean Water, Inc.
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error