CaseTrail

Tom Grimmett v. Patricia L. Brown

519 U.S. 233 · Decided January 14, 1997 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Tom Grimmett v. Patricia L. Brown was decided on January 14, 1997 unanimously (9–0). SCDB codes the disposition as “petition denied or appeal dismissed.” The decision was issued per curiam (an unsigned opinion of the Court). SCDB classifies its main issue as “No merits, writ improvidently granted” in the Judicial Power area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
519 U.S. 233 · 117 S. Ct. 759 · 136 L. Ed. 2d 674 · 1997 U.S. LEXIS 463
Docket number
95-1723
Decided
January 14, 1997
Argued
January 6, 1997
Decision type
Per curiam (orally argued)
Disposition
Petition denied or appeal dismissed
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
Vote
9–0 (unanimous)
Opinion assigned by
William H. Rehnquist
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Issue area
Judicial Power
Legal provision
Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO)
Type of law
Federal statute
Decision direction (SCDB)
Conservative what this means

How the Justices voted

Full case caption

Tom Grimmett, Trustee for the Bankruptcy Estate of Vincent Siragusa, and Joanne Siragusa v. Patricia L. Brown et al.

SCDB identifiers: case 1996-016, docket 1996-016-01.

Other cases on “No merits, writ improvidently granted”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO)

Same Term, same area (Judicial Power)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error