Randall Ricci v. Village of Arlington Heights
523 U.S. 613 · Decided May 4, 1998 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Randall Ricci v. Village of Arlington Heights was decided on May 4, 1998 unanimously (9–0). SCDB codes the disposition as “petition denied or appeal dismissed.” The decision was issued per curiam (an unsigned opinion of the Court). SCDB classifies its main issue as “No merits, writ improvidently granted” in the Judicial Power area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 523 U.S. 613 · 118 S. Ct. 1693 · 140 L. Ed. 2d 789 · 1998 U.S. LEXIS 2967
- Docket number
- 97-501
- Decided
- May 4, 1998
- Argued
- April 21, 1998
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Per curiam (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Petition denied or appeal dismissed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Opinion assigned by
- William H. Rehnquist
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- No merits, writ improvidently granted
- Issue area
- Judicial Power
- Legal provision
- Writ improvidently granted
- Type of law
- Other
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority | |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority | |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Majority | |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | |
| Justice David H. Souter | Majority | |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Majority | |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Majority | |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Majority |
Full case caption
Randall Ricci v. Village of Arlington Heights
SCDB identifiers: case 1997-061, docket 1997-061-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “No merits, writ improvidently granted”
- George G. Rogers v. United States
- Guy E. Adams v. Charlie Frank Robertson and Liberty National Life Insurance Company
- Tom Grimmett v. Patricia L. Brown
- District of Columbia v. Tri County Industries, Inc.
- Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Norman Y. Mineta
- Wanda Adams v. Florida Power Corporation and Florida Progress Corporation
Cases on the same legal provision: Writ improvidently granted
- California v. Rooney
- City of Springfield v. Kibbe
- Colorado v. Nunez
- Florida v. Casal
- Emulex Corp. v. Varjabedian
- Darden v. Florida
Same Term, same area (Judicial Power)
- Melvin Jefferson v. City of Tarrant
- General Electric Company v. Robert K. Joiner et Ux.
- City of Chicago v. International College of Surgeons
- George G. Rogers v. United States
- Regions Hospital v. Donna E. Shalala
- Mary Anna Rivet v. Regions Bank of Louisiana
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error