Marvin Klehr v. A. O. Smith Corporation and A. O. Smith Harvestore Products, Inc.
521 U.S. 179 · Decided June 19, 1997 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
Marvin Klehr v. A. O. Smith Corporation and A. O. Smith Harvestore Products, Inc. was decided on June 19, 1997 unanimously (9–0). The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Stephen G. Breyer wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Subconstitutional fair procedure, timeliness” in the Criminal Procedure area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 521 U.S. 179 · 117 S. Ct. 1984 · 138 L. Ed. 2d 373 · 1997 U.S. LEXIS 3861
- Docket number
- 96-663
- Decided
- June 19, 1997
- Argued
- April 21, 1997
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- Stephen G. Breyer
- Opinion assigned by
- William H. Rehnquist
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Subconstitutional fair procedure, timeliness
- Issue area
- Criminal Procedure
- Legal provision
- Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO)
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority | |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority | |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Special concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | |
| Justice David H. Souter | Majority | |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Special concurrence | |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Majority | |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
Full case caption
Marvin Klehr, et Ux. v. A. O. Smith Corporation and A. O. Smith Harvestore Products, Inc.
SCDB identifiers: case 1996-079, docket 1996-079-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Subconstitutional fair procedure, timeliness”
- North Star Steel Company v. Charles A. Thomas
- New York v. Michael Hill
- United States v. Pedro Alvarez-Sanchez
- United States v. Alejandro Garcia Ibarra
- Houston v. Lack
- Agency Holding Corp. v. Malley-Duff & Associates, Inc.
Cases on the same legal provision: Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO)
- Tom Grimmett v. Patricia L. Brown
- United States v. Juan Paul Robertson
- Mark Rotella v. Angela M. Wood
- Robert A. Beck v. Ronald M. Prupis
- National Organization for Women, Inc., Etc. v. Joseph Scheidler
- Cedric Kushner Promotions, Ltd. v. Don King
Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)
- California v. Kenneth Duane Roy
- Ohio v. Robert D. Robinette
- United States v. Vernon Watts
- Johnny Lynn Old Chief v. United States
- Maryland v. Jerry Lee Wilson
- Kenneth Lynce v. Hamilton MathisLaw held unconstitutional
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error