CaseTrail

Caterpillar Inc. v. James David Lewis

519 U.S. 61 · Decided December 10, 1996 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Caterpillar Inc. v. James David Lewis was decided on December 10, 1996 unanimously (9–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Jurisdiction of federal district or territorial courts” in the Judicial Power area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
519 U.S. 61 · 117 S. Ct. 467 · 136 L. Ed. 2d 437 · 1996 U.S. LEXIS 7643
Docket number
95-1263
Decided
December 10, 1996
Argued
November 12, 1996
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Reversed and remanded
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
9–0 (unanimous)
Majority opinion
Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Opinion assigned by
William H. Rehnquist
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Issue area
Judicial Power
Legal provision
28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type of law
Infrequently litigated statute
Decision direction (SCDB)
Liberal what this means

How the Justices voted

Full case caption

Caterpillar Inc. v. James David Lewis

SCDB identifiers: case 1996-008, docket 1996-008-01.

Other cases on “Jurisdiction of federal district or territorial courts”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Same Term, same area (Judicial Power)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error