Thompson v. Hebdon
140 S. Ct. 348 · Decided November 25, 2019 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Thompson v. Hebdon was decided on November 25, 2019 unanimously (9–0). The Court vacated the lower court's decision and remanded the case. The decision was issued per curiam (an unsigned opinion of the Court). SCDB classifies its main issue as “Campaign spending” in the First Amendment area.
Read the opinion
- CourtListener (Free Law Project) — opinion text
- Supreme Court of the United States — slip opinions, October Term 2019
- Supreme Court of the United States — docket 19-122
Case details
- Citations
- 140 S. Ct. 348 · 205 L. Ed. 2d 245 · 2019 U.S. LEXIS 7204
- Docket number
- 19-122
- Decided
- November 25, 2019
- Court era
- Roberts Court
- Decision type
- Per curiam (no oral argument)
- Disposition
- Vacated and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Opinion assigned by
- John G. Roberts Jr.
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Campaign spending
- Issue area
- First Amendment
- Legal provision
- First Amendment (speech, press, and assembly)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Majority | |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Majority | |
| Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Sonia Sotomayor | Majority | |
| Justice Elena Kagan | Majority | |
| Justice Neil M. Gorsuch | Majority | |
| Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh | Majority |
Full case caption
Thompson v. Hebdon
SCDB identifiers: case 2019-044, docket 2019-044-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Campaign spending”
- Federal Election Commission v. Ted Cruz for SenateLaw held unconstitutional
- Williams–yulee v. the Florida Bar
- McCutcheon v. FECLaw held unconstitutional
- National Republican Senatorial Committee v. Federal Election CommissionAltered precedentLaw held unconstitutional
- American Tradition Partnership, Inc. v. Steve BullockLaw held unconstitutional
- Arizona Free Enterprise Club's Freedom Club Pac v. Ken BennettLaw held unconstitutional
Cases on the same legal provision: First Amendment (speech, press, and assembly)
- Iancu v. BrunettiLaw held unconstitutional
- Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. Halleck
- Nieves v. Bartlett
- U.S. Agency for Int'l Development v. Alliance for Open Society Int'l
- Barr v. American Association of Political Consultants Inc.Law held unconstitutional
- Janus v. American Federation of StateAltered precedentLaw held unconstitutional
Same Term, same area (First Amendment)
- U.S. Agency for Int'l Development v. Alliance for Open Society Int'l
- Espinoza v. Montana Department of RevenueLaw held unconstitutional
- Barr v. American Association of Political Consultants Inc.Law held unconstitutional
- Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. Morrissey-Berru
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error