American Tradition Partnership, Inc. v. Steve Bullock
567 U.S. 516 · Decided June 25, 2012 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
American Tradition Partnership, Inc. v. Steve Bullock was decided on June 25, 2012 by a vote of 5–4. The Court reversed the lower court's decision. The decision was issued per curiam (an unsigned opinion of the Court). SCDB classifies its main issue as “Campaign spending” in the First Amendment area. SCDB records that the Court declared a state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision unconstitutional.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 567 U.S. 516 · 132 S. Ct. 2490 · 183 L. Ed. 2d 448 · 2012 U.S. LEXIS 4666
- Docket number
- 11-1179
- Decided
- June 25, 2012
- Court era
- Roberts Court
- Decision type
- Per curiam (no oral argument)
- Disposition
- Reversed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 5–4
- Opinion assigned by
- John G. Roberts Jr.
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Campaign spending
- Issue area
- First Amendment
- Legal provision
- First Amendment (speech, press, and assembly)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Held unconstitutional
- A state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Majority | |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Majority | |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Dissent | |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Sonia Sotomayor | Dissent | |
| Justice Elena Kagan | Dissent |
Full case caption
American Tradition Partnership, Inc., Fka Western Tradition Partnership, Inc., et al. v. Steve Bullock, Attorney General of Montana, et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 2011-073, docket 2011-073-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Campaign spending”
- Arizona Free Enterprise Club's Freedom Club Pac v. Ken BennettLaw held unconstitutional
- McCutcheon v. FECLaw held unconstitutional
- Citizens United v. Federal Election CommissionAltered precedentLaw held unconstitutional
- Williams–yulee v. the Florida Bar
- Davis v. FECLaw held unconstitutional
- Federal Election Commission v. Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc.Law held unconstitutional
Cases on the same legal provision: First Amendment (speech, press, and assembly)
- Dianne Knox v. Service Employees International Union
- Virgil D. 'gus' Reichle, Jr. v. Steven Howards
- Agency for International Development v. Alliance for Open Society International, Inc.Law held unconstitutional
- Edmund G. Brown, Jr. v. Entertainment Merchants AssociationLaw held unconstitutional
- Sorrell v. Ims Health Inc.Law held unconstitutional
- Nevada Commission on Ethics v. Michael A. Carrigan
Same Term, same area (First Amendment)
- Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionLaw held unconstitutional
- United States v. Xavier AlvarezLaw held unconstitutional
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error