Iancu v. Brunetti
139 S. Ct. 2294 · Decided June 24, 2019 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Iancu v. Brunetti was decided on June 24, 2019 by a vote of 6–3. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Elena Kagan wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “First Amendment, miscellaneous” in the First Amendment area. SCDB records that the Court declared an act of Congress unconstitutional.
Read the opinion
- CourtListener (Free Law Project) — opinion text
- Supreme Court of the United States — slip opinions, October Term 2018
- Supreme Court of the United States — docket 18-302
Case details
- Citations
- 139 S. Ct. 2294 · 204 L. Ed. 2d 714 · 2019 U.S. LEXIS 4201
- Docket number
- 18-302
- Decided
- June 24, 2019
- Argued
- April 15, 2019
- Court era
- Roberts Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 6–3
- Majority opinion
- Elena Kagan
- Opinion assigned by
- Clarence Thomas
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- First Amendment, miscellaneous
- Issue area
- First Amendment
- Legal provision
- First Amendment (speech, press, and assembly)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Held unconstitutional
- An act of Congress
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Majority | |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Majority | |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Sonia Sotomayor | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Elena Kagan | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Neil M. Gorsuch | Majority | |
| Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh | Majority |
Full case caption
Iancu v. Brunetti
SCDB identifiers: case 2018-064, docket 2018-064-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “First Amendment, miscellaneous”
- Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. Halleck
- Nieves v. Bartlett
- Lozman v. City of Riviera Beach
- U.S. Agency for Int'l Development v. Alliance for Open Society Int'l
- Minnesota Voters Alliance v. ManskyLaw held unconstitutional
- Barr v. American Association of Political Consultants Inc.Law held unconstitutional
Cases on the same legal provision: First Amendment (speech, press, and assembly)
- Thompson v. Hebdon
- Janus v. American Federation of StateAltered precedentLaw held unconstitutional
- National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. BecerraLaw held unconstitutional
- Expressions Hair Design v. Schneiderman
- City of Austin v. Reagan National Advertising of Texas Inc
- Federal Election Commission v. Ted Cruz for SenateLaw held unconstitutional
Same Term, same area (First Amendment)
- Nieves v. Bartlett
- Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. Halleck
- American Legion v. American Humanist Association
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error