Nieves v. Bartlett
139 S. Ct. 1715 · Decided May 28, 2019 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Nieves v. Bartlett was decided on May 28, 2019 by a vote of 8–1. The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “First Amendment, miscellaneous” in the First Amendment area.
Read the opinion
- CourtListener (Free Law Project) — opinion text
- Supreme Court of the United States — slip opinions, October Term 2018
- Supreme Court of the United States — docket 17-1174
Case details
- Citations
- 139 S. Ct. 1715 · 204 L. Ed. 2d 1 · 2019 U.S. LEXIS 3557
- Docket number
- 17-1174
- Decided
- May 28, 2019
- Argued
- November 26, 2018
- Court era
- Roberts Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 8–1
- Majority opinion
- John G. Roberts Jr.
- Opinion assigned by
- John G. Roberts Jr.
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- First Amendment, miscellaneous
- Issue area
- First Amendment
- Legal provision
- First Amendment (speech, press, and assembly)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Special concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Majority | |
| Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Sonia Sotomayor | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Elena Kagan | Majority | |
| Justice Neil M. Gorsuch | Special concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh | Majority |
Full case caption
Nieves v. Bartlett
SCDB identifiers: case 2018-033, docket 2018-033-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “First Amendment, miscellaneous”
- Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. Halleck
- Iancu v. BrunettiLaw held unconstitutional
- Lozman v. City of Riviera Beach
- Minnesota Voters Alliance v. ManskyLaw held unconstitutional
- U.S. Agency for Int'l Development v. Alliance for Open Society Int'l
- Barr v. American Association of Political Consultants Inc.Law held unconstitutional
Cases on the same legal provision: First Amendment (speech, press, and assembly)
- Thompson v. Hebdon
- Janus v. American Federation of StateAltered precedentLaw held unconstitutional
- National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. BecerraLaw held unconstitutional
- Expressions Hair Design v. Schneiderman
- City of Austin v. Reagan National Advertising of Texas Inc
- Federal Election Commission v. Ted Cruz for SenateLaw held unconstitutional
Same Term, same area (First Amendment)
- Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. Halleck
- American Legion v. American Humanist Association
- Iancu v. BrunettiLaw held unconstitutional
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error