Sugarman v. Dougall
413 U.S. 634 · Decided June 25, 1973 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
Sugarman v. Dougall was decided on June 25, 1973 by a vote of 8–1. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Harry A. Blackmun wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Employability of aliens” in the Civil Rights area. SCDB records that the Court declared a state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision unconstitutional.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 413 U.S. 634 · 93 S. Ct. 2842 · 37 L. Ed. 2d 853 · 1973 U.S. LEXIS 147
- Docket number
- 71-1222
- Decided
- June 25, 1973
- Argued
- January 8, 1973
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 8–1
- Majority opinion
- Harry A. Blackmun
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- Employability of aliens
- Issue area
- Civil Rights
- Legal provision
- Fourteenth Amendment (equal protection)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Held unconstitutional
- A state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William O. Douglas | Majority | |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
Full case caption
Sugarman, Administrator, New York City Human Resources Administration, et al. v. Dougall et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1972-179, docket 1972-179-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Employability of aliens”
- In re Griffiths
- Espinoza et Vir v. Farah Manufacturing Co., Inc.
- Saxbe v. Bustos
- De Canas v. Bica
- Hampton v. Mow Sun WongLaw held unconstitutional
- Examining Board of Engineers v. Flores de OteroLaw held unconstitutional
Cases on the same legal provision: Fourteenth Amendment (equal protection)
- Norwood v. Harrison
- Keyes v. School District No. 1
- Gaffney v. Cummings
- White v. RegesterLaw held unconstitutional
- New Jersey Welfare Rights Organization v. CahillLaw held unconstitutional
- San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez
Same Term, same area (Civil Rights)
- Philpott v. Essex County Welfare BoardLaw held unconstitutional
- District of Columbia v. Carter
- United States v. Kras
- Goosby v. Osser
- Gomez v. PerezLaw held unconstitutional
- Mahan v. HowellLaw held unconstitutional
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error