Saxbe v. Bustos
419 U.S. 65 · Decided November 25, 1974 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Saxbe v. Bustos was decided on November 25, 1974 by a vote of 5–4. The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice William O. Douglas wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Employability of aliens” in the Civil Rights area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 419 U.S. 65 · 95 S. Ct. 272 · 42 L. Ed. 2d 231 · 1974 U.S. LEXIS 156
- Docket number
- 73-300
- Decided
- November 25, 1974
- Argued
- October 17, 1974
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 5–4
- Majority opinion
- William O. Douglas
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Employability of aliens
- Issue area
- Civil Rights
- Legal provision
- Immigration and Nationality statutes
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William O. Douglas | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Dissent | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Dissent | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Dissent | |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority |
Full case caption
Saxbe, Attorney General, et al. v. Bustos et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1974-007, docket 1974-007-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Employability of aliens”
- Espinoza et Vir v. Farah Manufacturing Co., Inc.
- De Canas v. Bica
- Sugarman v. DougallLaw held unconstitutional
- In re Griffiths
- Hampton v. Mow Sun WongLaw held unconstitutional
- Examining Board of Engineers v. Flores de OteroLaw held unconstitutional
Cases on the same legal provision: Immigration and Nationality statutes
- Reid et Ux. v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
- United States Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Hibi
- Kleindienst v. Mandel
- Fiallo v. Bell
- Elkins v. Moreno
- Agosto v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Same Term, same area (Civil Rights)
- Schick v. Reed
- Sosna v. Iowa
- Schlesinger v. Ballard
- Taylor v. LouisianaAltered precedentLaw held unconstitutional
- United States v. Mazurie
- North Georgia Finishing, Inc. v. Di-Chem, Inc.Law held unconstitutional
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error