Examining Board of Engineers v. Flores de Otero
426 U.S. 572 · Decided June 17, 1976 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
Examining Board of Engineers v. Flores de Otero was decided on June 17, 1976 by a vote of 7–1. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Harry A. Blackmun wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Employability of aliens” in the Civil Rights area. SCDB records that the Court declared a state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision unconstitutional.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 426 U.S. 572 · 96 S. Ct. 2264 · 49 L. Ed. 2d 65 · 1976 U.S. LEXIS 65
- Docket number
- 74-1267
- Decided
- June 17, 1976
- Argued
- December 8, 1975
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 7–1
- Majority opinion
- Harry A. Blackmun
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- Employability of aliens
- Issue area
- Civil Rights
- Legal provision
- 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Reconstruction Civil Rights Acts)
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Held unconstitutional
- A state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
Did not participate: John Paul Stevens.
Full case caption
Examining Board of Engineers, Architects and Surveyors et al. v. Flores de Otero
SCDB identifiers: case 1975-134, docket 1975-134-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Employability of aliens”
- Hampton v. Mow Sun WongLaw held unconstitutional
- De Canas v. Bica
- Saxbe v. Bustos
- Foley v. Connelie
- Espinoza et Vir v. Farah Manufacturing Co., Inc.
- Ambach v. Norwick
Cases on the same legal provision: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Reconstruction Civil Rights Acts)
- Aldinger v. Howard
- Paul v. Davis
- Imbler v. Pachtman
- Rizzo v. Goode
- Wood v. Strickland
- Procunier v. Navarette
Same Term, same area (Civil Rights)
- Turner v. Department of Employment Security of UtahLaw held unconstitutional
- Mathews v. Eldridge
- De Canas v. Bica
- Fisher v. District Court of the Sixteenth Judicial District of Montana
- Imbler v. Pachtman
- Lavine v. Milne
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error