Gaffney v. Cummings
412 U.S. 735 · Decided June 18, 1973 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Gaffney v. Cummings was decided on June 18, 1973 by a vote of 6–3. The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice Byron R. White wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Reapportionment (other than Voting Rights Act plans)” in the Civil Rights area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 412 U.S. 735 · 93 S. Ct. 2321 · 37 L. Ed. 2d 298 · 1973 U.S. LEXIS 52
- Docket number
- 71-1476
- Decided
- June 18, 1973
- Argued
- February 26, 1973
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 6–3
- Majority opinion
- Byron R. White
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue area
- Civil Rights
- Legal provision
- Fourteenth Amendment (equal protection)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William O. Douglas | Dissent | |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Dissent | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority |
Full case caption
Gaffney v. Cummings et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1972-152, docket 1972-152-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Reapportionment (other than Voting Rights Act plans)”
- White v. RegesterLaw held unconstitutional
- White v. WeiserLaw held unconstitutional
- Salyer Land Co. v. Tulare Lake Basin Water Storage District
- Associated Enterprises, Inc. v. Toltec Watershed Improvement District
- Mahan v. HowellLaw held unconstitutional
- Taylor v. McKeithen
Cases on the same legal provision: Fourteenth Amendment (equal protection)
- Keyes v. School District No. 1
- Norwood v. Harrison
- Sugarman v. DougallLaw held unconstitutional
- In re Griffiths
- New Jersey Welfare Rights Organization v. CahillLaw held unconstitutional
- San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez
Same Term, same area (Civil Rights)
- Philpott v. Essex County Welfare BoardLaw held unconstitutional
- District of Columbia v. Carter
- United States v. Kras
- Goosby v. Osser
- Gomez v. PerezLaw held unconstitutional
- Mahan v. HowellLaw held unconstitutional
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error