Frontiero et Vir v. Richardson
411 U.S. 677 · Decided May 14, 1973 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
Frontiero et Vir v. Richardson was decided on May 14, 1973 by a vote of 8–1. The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice William J. Brennan Jr. wrote the opinion announcing the judgment of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Sex discrimination (excluding employment)” in the Civil Rights area. SCDB records that the Court declared an act of Congress unconstitutional.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 411 U.S. 677 · 93 S. Ct. 1764 · 36 L. Ed. 2d 583 · 1973 U.S. LEXIS 153
- Docket number
- 71-1694
- Decided
- May 14, 1973
- Argued
- January 17, 1973
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Judgment of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 8–1
- Majority opinion
- William J. Brennan Jr.
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- Sex discrimination (excluding employment)
- Issue area
- Civil Rights
- Legal provision
- Fifth Amendment (equal protection)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Held unconstitutional
- An act of Congress
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William O. Douglas | Majority | |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Judgment of the Court | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Special concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Special concurrence | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Special concurrence | |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Special concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
Full case caption
Frontiero et Vir v. Richardson, Secretary of Defense, et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1972-113, docket 1972-113-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Sex discrimination (excluding employment)”
- Kahn v. Shevin
- Stanley v. IllinoisLaw held unconstitutional
- Reed v. ReedLaw held unconstitutional
- Schlesinger v. Ballard
- Taylor v. LouisianaAltered precedentLaw held unconstitutional
- Weinberger v. WiesenfeldLaw held unconstitutional
Cases on the same legal provision: Fifth Amendment (equal protection)
- United States v. Kras
- Morton v. Mancari
- Jimenez v. WeinbergerLaw held unconstitutional
- Richardson v. Belcher
- Weinberger v. Salfi
- Washington v. Davis
Same Term, same area (Civil Rights)
- Philpott v. Essex County Welfare BoardLaw held unconstitutional
- District of Columbia v. Carter
- United States v. Kras
- Goosby v. Osser
- Gomez v. PerezLaw held unconstitutional
- Mahan v. HowellLaw held unconstitutional
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error