Mathews v. de Castro
429 U.S. 181 · Decided December 13, 1976 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Mathews v. de Castro was decided on December 13, 1976 unanimously (9–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice Potter Stewart wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Sex discrimination (excluding employment)” in the Civil Rights area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 429 U.S. 181 · 97 S. Ct. 431 · 50 L. Ed. 2d 389 · 1976 U.S. LEXIS 182
- Docket number
- 75-1197
- Decided
- December 13, 1976
- Argued
- November 8, 1976
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- Potter Stewart
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- Sex discrimination (excluding employment)
- Issue area
- Civil Rights
- Legal provision
- Social Security Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Special concurrence | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority |
Full case caption
Mathews, Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare v. de Castro
SCDB identifiers: case 1976-024, docket 1976-024-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Sex discrimination (excluding employment)”
- Craig v. BorenAltered precedentLaw held unconstitutional
- Stanton v. Stanton
- Califano v. GoldfarbLaw held unconstitutional
- Califano v. Webster
- Vorchheimer v. School District of Philadelphia
- Quilloin v. Walcott et Vir
Cases on the same legal provision: Social Security Act
- Califano v. Torres
- Califano v. Yamasaki
- New York State Department of Social Services v. Dublino
- Philpott v. Essex County Welfare BoardLaw held unconstitutional
- Richardson v. Wright
- Richardson v. Perales
Same Term, same area (Civil Rights)
- Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Bagamasbad
- General Electric Co. v. Gilbert
- Craig v. BorenAltered precedentLaw held unconstitutional
- International Union of Electrical v. Robbins & Myers, Inc.
- Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.
- Knebel v. Hein
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error