Zauderer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel of the Supreme Court of Ohio
471 U.S. 626 · Decided May 28, 1985 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
Zauderer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel of the Supreme Court of Ohio was decided on May 28, 1985 by a vote of 5–3. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision in part and reversed or vacated it in part. Justice Byron R. White wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Commercial speech, attorneys” in the Attorneys area. SCDB records that the Court declared a state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision unconstitutional.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 471 U.S. 626 · 105 S. Ct. 2265 · 85 L. Ed. 2d 652 · 1985 U.S. LEXIS 19
- Docket number
- 83-2166
- Decided
- May 28, 1985
- Argued
- January 7, 1985
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed and reversed (or vacated) in part
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 5–3
- Majority opinion
- Byron R. White
- Opinion assigned by
- William J. Brennan Jr.
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- Commercial speech, attorneys
- Issue area
- Attorneys
- Legal provision
- First Amendment (speech, press, and assembly)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Held unconstitutional
- A state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Concurrence | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Dissent | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Dissent | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority | |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
Did not participate: Lewis F. Powell Jr..
Full case caption
Zauderer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel of the Supreme Court of Ohio
SCDB identifiers: case 1984-102, docket 1984-102-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Commercial speech, attorneys”
- Shapero v. Kentucky Bar AssociationLaw held unconstitutional
- In re R. M. J.Law held unconstitutional
- Gary E. Peel v. Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission of IllinoisLaw held unconstitutional
- In re Primus
- Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Assn.
- Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaLaw held unconstitutional
Cases on the same legal provision: First Amendment (speech, press, and assembly)
- Brockett v. Spokane Arcades, Inc.Law held unconstitutional
- Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. Greenmoss Builders, Inc.
- Cornelius v. NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.
- Wayte v. United States
- Federal Election Commission v. National Conservative Political Action CommitteeLaw held unconstitutional
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Public Utilities Commission of CaliforniaLaw held unconstitutional
Same Term, same area (Attorneys)
- Roger L. Spencer v. South Carolina Tax Commission
- Webb v. County Board of Education of Dyer County
- In re Snyder
- Marek v. Chesny
- Kentucky v. Graham
- Walters v. National Association of Radiation Survivors
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error