Nautilus, Inc. v. Biosig Instruments, Inc
572 U.S. 898 · Decided June 2, 2014 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Nautilus, Inc. v. Biosig Instruments, Inc was decided on June 2, 2014 unanimously (9–0). The Court vacated the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Patents” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 572 U.S. 898 · 134 S. Ct. 2120 · 189 L. Ed. 2d 37 · 2014 U.S. LEXIS 3818
- Docket number
- 13-369
- Decided
- June 2, 2014
- Argued
- April 28, 2014
- Court era
- Roberts Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Vacated and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- Ruth Bader Ginsburg
- Opinion assigned by
- John G. Roberts Jr.
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Patents
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- 35-112
- Type of law
- Infrequently litigated statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Majority | |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Majority | |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Majority | |
| Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Sonia Sotomayor | Majority | |
| Justice Elena Kagan | Majority |
Full case caption
Nautilus, Inc. v. Biosig Instruments, Inc
SCDB identifiers: case 2013-052, docket 2013-052-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Patents”
- Limelight Networks, Inc. v. Akamai Technologies, Inc.
- Medtronic, Inc. v. Mirowski Family Ventures, LLC
- Teva Pharms. USA, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc.
- Commil USA, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc.
- Vernon Hugh Bowman v. Monsanto Company
- Kimble v. Marvel Enterprises, Inc.
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Heimeshoff v. Hartford Life & Accident Ins. Co.
- Medtronic, Inc. v. Mirowski Family Ventures, LLC
- Chadbourne & Parke LLP v. Troice
- Law v. Siegel
- Bg Group PLC v. Republic of Argentina
- Paroline v. United States
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error