Teva Pharms. USA, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc.
574 U.S. 318 · Decided January 20, 2015 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Teva Pharms. USA, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc. was decided on January 20, 2015 by a vote of 7–2. The Court vacated the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Stephen G. Breyer wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Patents” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 574 U.S. 318 · 135 S. Ct. 45 · 189 L. Ed. 2d 895 · 2015 U.S. LEXIS 628
- Docket number
- 13-854
- Decided
- January 20, 2015
- Argued
- October 15, 2014
- Court era
- Roberts Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Vacated and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 7–2
- Majority opinion
- Stephen G. Breyer
- Opinion assigned by
- John G. Roberts Jr.
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Patents
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Federal Rules of Civil or Appellate Procedure
- Type of law
- Court rules
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Majority | |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Majority | |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. | Dissent | |
| Justice Sonia Sotomayor | Majority | |
| Justice Elena Kagan | Majority |
Full case caption
Teva Pharms. USA, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc.
SCDB identifiers: case 2014-009, docket 2014-009-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Patents”
- Commil USA, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc.
- Kimble v. Marvel Enterprises, Inc.
- Limelight Networks, Inc. v. Akamai Technologies, Inc.
- Nautilus, Inc. v. Biosig Instruments, Inc
- Medtronic, Inc. v. Mirowski Family Ventures, LLC
- Halo Electronics v. Pulse Electronics
Cases on the same legal provision: Federal Rules of Civil or Appellate Procedure
- Gelboim v. Bank of Am. Corp.
- Jennings v. Stephens
- Tracey L. Johnson v. City of Shelby
- Ray Haluch Gravel Co. v. Cent. Pension Fund of Int'l Union of Operating Eng'rs
- Tyson Foods, Inc. v. Bouaphakeo
- Ryan v. Schad
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Jesinoski v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.
- T Mobile South, LLC v. City of Roswell
- Hana Financial, Inc. v. Hana Bank
- M&g Polymers USA, LLC v. Tackett
- Nc Bd. of Dental Examiners v. FTC
- Direct Mktg. Ass'n v. Brohl
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error