CaseTrail

Chadbourne & Parke LLP v. Troice

571 U.S. 377 · Decided February 26, 2014 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Chadbourne & Parke LLP v. Troice was decided on February 26, 2014 by a vote of 7–2. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Stephen G. Breyer wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Securities regulation” in the Economic Activity area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
571 U.S. 377 · 134 S. Ct. 1058 · 188 L. Ed. 2d 88 · 2014 U.S. LEXIS 1644
Docket number
12-79
Decided
February 26, 2014
Argued
October 7, 2013
Court era
Roberts Court
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Affirmed
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
Vote
7–2
Majority opinion
Stephen G. Breyer
Opinion assigned by
John G. Roberts Jr.
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Legal provision
15-78bb
Type of law
Infrequently litigated statute
Decision direction (SCDB)
Liberal what this means

How the Justices voted

Full case caption

Chadbourne & Parke LLP v. Troice

SCDB identifiers: case 2013-022, docket 2013-022-01.

Other cases on “Securities regulation”

See all

Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error