CaseTrail

Limelight Networks, Inc. v. Akamai Technologies, Inc.

572 U.S. 915 · Decided June 2, 2014 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Limelight Networks, Inc. v. Akamai Technologies, Inc. was decided on June 2, 2014 unanimously (9–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Patents” in the Economic Activity area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
572 U.S. 915 · 134 S. Ct. 2111 · 189 L. Ed. 2d 52 · 2014 U.S. LEXIS 3817
Docket number
12-786
Decided
June 2, 2014
Argued
April 30, 2014
Court era
Roberts Court
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Reversed and remanded
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
9–0 (unanimous)
Majority opinion
Samuel A. Alito Jr.
Opinion assigned by
John G. Roberts Jr.
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Issue (SCDB)
Patents
Legal provision
35-271
Type of law
Infrequently litigated statute
Decision direction (SCDB)
Liberal what this means

How the Justices voted

Full case caption

Limelight Networks, Inc. v. Akamai Technologies, Inc.

SCDB identifiers: case 2013-051, docket 2013-051-01.

Other cases on “Patents”

See all

Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error