Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc. v. Public Utility District No. 1 of Snohomish County
554 U.S. 527 · Decided June 26, 2008 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc. v. Public Utility District No. 1 of Snohomish County was decided on June 26, 2008 by a vote of 5–2. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Antonin Scalia wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Electric power regulation” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 554 U.S. 527 · 128 S. Ct. 2733 · 171 L. Ed. 2d 607 · 2008 U.S. LEXIS 5266
- Docket number
- 06-1457
- Decided
- June 26, 2008
- Argued
- February 19, 2008
- Court era
- Roberts Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 5–2
- Majority opinion
- Antonin Scalia
- Opinion assigned by
- Antonin Scalia
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Electric power regulation
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Federal Power Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | |
| Justice David H. Souter | Dissent | |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Majority | |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Special concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. | Majority |
Did not participate: Stephen G. Breyer, John G. Roberts Jr..
Full case caption
Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc. v. Public Utility District No. 1 of Snohomish County, Washington, et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 2007-070, docket 2007-070-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Electric power regulation”
- Entergy Corporation v. Riverkeeper, Inc.
- NRG Power Marketing, LLC v. Maine Public Utilities Commission
- Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. Electric Power Supply Association
- West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency
- Arcadia v. Ohio Power Company
- American Paper Institute, Inc. v. American Electric Power Service Corp.
Cases on the same legal provision: Federal Power Act
- Entergy Louisiana, Inc. v. Louisiana Public Service Commission
- New York v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
- Hughes v. PPL Energyplus
- California v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
- Mississippi Power & Light Co. v. Mississippi ex Rel. Moore
- Nantahala Power & Light Co. v. Thornburg
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Georgia State Board of Equalization
- Stoneridge Investment Partners, LLC v. Scientific-Atlanta, Inc.
- Abdus-Shahid M. S. Ali v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
- James Larue v. Dewolff
- Hall Street Associates, L.L.C. v. Mattel, Inc
- Meadwestvaco Corporation v. Illinois Department of Revenue
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error