CaseTrail

Nantahala Power & Light Co. v. Thornburg

476 U.S. 953 · Decided June 16, 1986 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Nantahala Power & Light Co. v. Thornburg was decided on June 16, 1986 unanimously (7–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Sandra Day O'Connor wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Federal preemption of state legislation or regulation” in the Federalism area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
476 U.S. 953 · 106 S. Ct. 2349 · 90 L. Ed. 2d 943 · 1986 U.S. LEXIS 61
Docket number
85-568
Decided
June 16, 1986
Argued
April 21, 1986
Court era
Burger Court
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Reversed and remanded
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
7–0 (unanimous)
Majority opinion
Sandra Day O'Connor
Opinion assigned by
Warren E. Burger
How the case arrived
Appeal
Issue area
Federalism
Legal provision
Federal Power Act
Type of law
Federal statute
Decision direction (SCDB)
Liberal what this means

How the Justices voted

Did not participate: Lewis F. Powell Jr., John Paul Stevens.

Full case caption

Nantahala Power & Light Co. et al. v. Thornburg, Attorney General of North Carolina, et al.

SCDB identifiers: case 1985-113, docket 1985-113-01.

Other cases on “Federal preemption of state legislation or regulation”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: Federal Power Act

Same Term, same area (Federalism)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error