Arcadia v. Ohio Power Company
498 U.S. 73 · Decided November 27, 1990 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Arcadia v. Ohio Power Company was decided on November 27, 1990 unanimously (8–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Antonin Scalia wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Electric power regulation” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 498 U.S. 73 · 111 S. Ct. 415 · 112 L. Ed. 2d 374 · 1990 U.S. LEXIS 6113
- Docket number
- 89-1283
- Decided
- November 27, 1990
- Argued
- October 1, 1990
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 8–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- Antonin Scalia
- Opinion assigned by
- William H. Rehnquist
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Electric power regulation
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Federal Power Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Concurrence | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority | |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority |
Did not participate: David H. Souter.
Full case caption
Arcadia, Ohio, et al. v. Ohio Power Company, et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1990-011, docket 1990-011-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Electric power regulation”
- American Paper Institute, Inc. v. American Electric Power Service Corp.
- Federal Energy Administration v. Algonquin SNG, Inc.
- Federal Power Commission v. Conway Corp.
- Chemehuevi Tribe of Indians v. Federal Power Commission
- Federal Power Commission v. New England Power Co.
- Gulf States Utilities Co. v. Federal Power Commission
Cases on the same legal provision: Federal Power Act
- California v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
- Mississippi Power & Light Co. v. Mississippi ex Rel. Moore
- Nantahala Power & Light Co. v. Thornburg
- Escondido Mutual Water Co. v. La Jolla Band of Mission Indians
- Arkansas Electric Cooperative Corp. v. Arkansas Public Service Commission
- New York v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Mercedel W. Miles v. Apex Marine Corporation
- Jay Palmer v. BRG of Georgia, Inc.
- Coy R. Grogan v. Frank J. Garner, Jr.
- McDermott International, Inc. v. Jon C. Wilander
- Trinova Corporation v. Michigan Department of Treasury
- Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Cleopatra Haslip
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error