Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. Electric Power Supply Association
577 U.S. 260 · Decided January 25, 2016 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. Electric Power Supply Association was decided on January 25, 2016 by a vote of 6–2. The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Elena Kagan wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Electric power regulation” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 577 U.S. 260 · 136 S. Ct. 760 · 193 L. Ed. 2d 661 · 2016 U.S. LEXIS 853
- Docket number
- 14-840
- Decided
- January 25, 2016
- Argued
- October 14, 2015
- Court era
- Roberts Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 6–2
- Majority opinion
- Elena Kagan
- Opinion assigned by
- John G. Roberts Jr.
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Electric power regulation
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Federal Power Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Dissent | |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Majority | |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Majority | |
| Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Sonia Sotomayor | Majority | |
| Justice Elena Kagan | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
Did not participate: Samuel A. Alito Jr..
Full case caption
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. Electric Power Supply Association
SCDB identifiers: case 2015-008, docket 2015-008-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Electric power regulation”
- NRG Power Marketing, LLC v. Maine Public Utilities Commission
- West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency
- Entergy Corporation v. Riverkeeper, Inc.
- Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc. v. Public Utility District No. 1 of Snohomish County
- Arcadia v. Ohio Power Company
- American Paper Institute, Inc. v. American Electric Power Service Corp.
Cases on the same legal provision: Federal Power Act
- Hughes v. PPL Energyplus
- Entergy Louisiana, Inc. v. Louisiana Public Service Commission
- New York v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
- California v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
- Mississippi Power & Light Co. v. Mississippi ex Rel. Moore
- Nantahala Power & Light Co. v. Thornburg
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Obb Personenverkehr Ag v. Sachs
- Directv, Inc. v. Imburgia
- Montanile v. Bd. of National Elevator Industry Health Benefit Plan
- Amgen Inc. v. Steve Harris
- Vl v. El
- Sturgeon v. Frost
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error