Hall v. Hall
138 S. Ct. 1118 · Decided March 27, 2018 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Hall v. Hall was decided on March 27, 2018 unanimously (9–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Federal rules of civil procedure” in the Judicial Power area.
Read the opinion
- CourtListener (Free Law Project) — opinion text
- Supreme Court of the United States — slip opinions, October Term 2017
Case details
- Citations
- 138 S. Ct. 1118 · 200 L. Ed. 2d 399 · 2018 U.S. LEXIS 2062
- Docket number
- 16-1150
- Decided
- March 27, 2018
- Argued
- January 16, 2018
- Court era
- Roberts Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- John G. Roberts Jr.
- Opinion assigned by
- John G. Roberts Jr.
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Federal rules of civil procedure
- Issue area
- Judicial Power
- Legal provision
- Federal Rules of Civil or Appellate Procedure
- Type of law
- Court rules
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Majority | |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Majority | |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Majority | |
| Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Sonia Sotomayor | Majority | |
| Justice Elena Kagan | Majority | |
| Justice Neil M. Gorsuch | Majority |
Full case caption
Hall v. Hall
SCDB identifiers: case 2017-037, docket 2017-037-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Federal rules of civil procedure”
- Animal Science Products v. Hebei Welcome Pharmaceutical Co.
- Hamer v. Neighborhood Housing Services of Chicago
- Nutraceutical Corp. v. Lambert
- City of San Antonio v. Hotels.com, L.P.
- Gelboim v. Bank of Am. Corp.
- Tracey L. Johnson v. City of Shelby
Cases on the same legal provision: Federal Rules of Civil or Appellate Procedure
- Tharpe v. Sellers
- Manrique v. United States
- Tyson Foods, Inc. v. Bouaphakeo
- Teva Pharms. USA, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc.
- Jennings v. Stephens
- United States v. Zubaydah
Same Term, same area (Judicial Power)
- Hamer v. Neighborhood Housing Services of Chicago
- In re United States
- National Association of Manufacturers v. Department of Defense
- Artis v. District of Columbia
- Patchak v. Zinke
- Kisela v. Hughes
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error