Benisek v. Lamone
138 S. Ct. 1942 · Decided June 18, 2018 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Benisek v. Lamone was decided on June 18, 2018 unanimously (9–0). The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. The decision was issued per curiam (an unsigned opinion of the Court). SCDB classifies its main issue as “Jurisdiction of federal district or territorial courts” in the Judicial Power area.
Read the opinion
- CourtListener (Free Law Project) — opinion text
- Supreme Court of the United States — slip opinions, October Term 2017
- Supreme Court of the United States — docket 17-333
Case details
- Citations
- 138 S. Ct. 1942 · 201 L. Ed. 2d 398 · 2018 U.S. LEXIS 3688
- Docket number
- 17-333
- Decided
- June 18, 2018
- Argued
- March 28, 2018
- Court era
- Roberts Court
- Decision type
- Per curiam (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Opinion assigned by
- John G. Roberts Jr.
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue area
- Judicial Power
- Type of law
- No legal provision
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Majority | |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Majority | |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Majority | |
| Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Sonia Sotomayor | Majority | |
| Justice Elena Kagan | Majority | |
| Justice Neil M. Gorsuch | Majority |
Full case caption
Benisek v. Lamone
SCDB identifiers: case 2017-052, docket 2017-052-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Jurisdiction of federal district or territorial courts”
- Patchak v. Zinke
- In re United States
- Jam v. Int'l Finance Corp.
- Smith v. Berryhill
- PDR Network, LLC v. Carlton & Harris Chiropractic Inc.
- Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela v. Helmerich & Payne International Drilling Co.
Same Term, same area (Judicial Power)
- Hamer v. Neighborhood Housing Services of Chicago
- In re United States
- National Association of Manufacturers v. Department of Defense
- Artis v. District of Columbia
- Patchak v. Zinke
- Hall v. Hall
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error