Federal Trade Commission v. Texaco Inc.
393 U.S. 223 · Decided December 16, 1968 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Federal Trade Commission v. Texaco Inc. was decided on December 16, 1968 by a vote of 8–1. The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Hugo L. Black wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Antitrust” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 393 U.S. 223 · 89 S. Ct. 429 · 21 L. Ed. 2d 394 · 1968 U.S. LEXIS 3076
- Docket number
- 24
- Decided
- December 16, 1968
- Argued
- November 13, 1968
- Court era
- Warren Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 8–1
- Majority opinion
- Hugo L. Black
- Opinion assigned by
- Earl Warren
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Antitrust
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Federal Trade Commission Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Hugo L. Black | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice William O. Douglas | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Earl Warren | Majority | |
| Justice John M. Harlan II | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Abe Fortas | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority |
Full case caption
Federal Trade Commission v. Texaco Inc. et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1968-021, docket 1968-021-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Antitrust”
- United States v. Concentrated Phosphate Export Assn., Inc.
- United States v. Container Corporation of America
- Citizen Publishing Co. v. United States
- Fortner Enterprises, Inc. v. United States Steel Corp.
- Norfolk Monument Co., Inc. v. Woodlawn Memorial Gardens, Inc.
- Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe Machinery Corp.
Cases on the same legal provision: Federal Trade Commission Act
- Federal Trade Commission v. Flotill Products, Inc.
- Federal Trade Commission v. Mary Carter Paint Co.
- Atlantic Refining Co. v. Federal Trade Commission
- St. Regis Paper Co. v. United States
- Federal Trade Commission v. Cement Institute
- Amg Capital Management, LLC v. Federal Trade Commission
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Continental Oil Co. v. United States
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co. v. Aberdeen & Rockfish Railroad Co.
- Whyy, Inc. v. Borough of GlassboroLaw held unconstitutional
- Commonwealth Coatings Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co.
- Grunenthal v. Long Island Rail Road Co.
- United States v. Concentrated Phosphate Export Assn., Inc.
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error