Atlantic Refining Co. v. Federal Trade Commission
381 U.S. 357 · Decided June 1, 1965 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Atlantic Refining Co. v. Federal Trade Commission was decided on June 1, 1965 by a vote of 6–3. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Tom C. Clark wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Judicial review of agency actions” in the Judicial Power area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 381 U.S. 357 · 85 S. Ct. 1498 · 14 L. Ed. 2d 443 · 1965 U.S. LEXIS 2446
- Docket number
- 292
- Decided
- June 1, 1965
- Argued
- March 30, 1965
- Court era
- Warren Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 6–3
- Majority opinion
- Tom C. Clark
- Opinion assigned by
- Earl Warren
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Judicial review of agency actions
- Issue area
- Judicial Power
- Legal provision
- Federal Trade Commission Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Hugo L. Black | Majority | |
| Justice William O. Douglas | Majority | |
| Justice Tom C. Clark | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Chief Justice Earl Warren | Majority | |
| Justice John M. Harlan II | Dissent | |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Arthur J. Goldberg | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
Full case caption
Atlantic Refining Co. v. Federal Trade Commission
SCDB identifiers: case 1964-115, docket 1964-115-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Judicial review of agency actions”
- United Gas Improvement Co. v. Continental Oil Co.
- Federal Communications Commission v. Schreiber
- Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship Clerks v. Association for the Benefit of Non-Contract Employees
- Udall v. Tallman
- Whitney National Bank in Jefferson Parish v. Bank of New Orleans & Trust Co.
- Federal Trade Commission v. Mary Carter Paint Co.
Cases on the same legal provision: Federal Trade Commission Act
- Federal Trade Commission v. Colgate-Palmolive Co.
- Federal Trade Commission v. Brown Shoe Co., Inc.
- St. Regis Paper Co. v. United States
- Federal Trade Commission v. Texaco Inc.
- Federal Trade Commission v. Sperry & Hutchinson Co.
- Federal Trade Commission v. National Lead Co.
Same Term, same area (Judicial Power)
- Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship Clerks v. United Air Lines, Inc.
- Schlagenhauf v. Holder, U.S. District Judge for the Southern District of Indiana
- Railway Labor Executives' Association v. United States
- Farmer v. Arabian American Oil Co.
- All States Freight, Inc. v. New York
- United States v. First National City Bank
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error