United States v. Container Corporation of America
393 U.S. 333 · Decided January 14, 1969 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
United States v. Container Corporation of America was decided on January 14, 1969 by a vote of 6–3. The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice William O. Douglas wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Antitrust” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 393 U.S. 333 · 89 S. Ct. 510 · 21 L. Ed. 2d 526 · 1969 U.S. LEXIS 3112
- Docket number
- 27
- Decided
- January 14, 1969
- Argued
- November 18, 1968
- Court era
- Warren Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 6–3
- Majority opinion
- William O. Douglas
- Opinion assigned by
- Earl Warren
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- Antitrust
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Sherman Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Hugo L. Black | Majority | |
| Justice William O. Douglas | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Chief Justice Earl Warren | Majority | |
| Justice John M. Harlan II | Dissent | |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Dissent | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Abe Fortas | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
Full case caption
United States v. Container Corporation of America et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1968-030, docket 1968-030-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Antitrust”
- Federal Trade Commission v. Texaco Inc.
- United States v. Concentrated Phosphate Export Assn., Inc.
- Citizen Publishing Co. v. United States
- Fortner Enterprises, Inc. v. United States Steel Corp.
- Norfolk Monument Co., Inc. v. Woodlawn Memorial Gardens, Inc.
- Perkins v. Standard Oil Co. of California
Cases on the same legal provision: Sherman Act
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.
- United Mine Workers of America v. Pennington
- Local Union No. 189 v. Jewel Tea Co., Inc.
- United States v. First National Bank & Trust Co. of Lexington
- Los Angeles Meat & Provision Drivers Union v. United States
- International Boxing Club of New York, Inc. v. United States
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Continental Oil Co. v. United States
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co. v. Aberdeen & Rockfish Railroad Co.
- Whyy, Inc. v. Borough of GlassboroLaw held unconstitutional
- Commonwealth Coatings Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co.
- Grunenthal v. Long Island Rail Road Co.
- United States v. Concentrated Phosphate Export Assn., Inc.
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error