CaseTrail

Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe Machinery Corp.

392 U.S. 481 · Decided June 17, 1968 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe Machinery Corp. was decided on June 17, 1968 by a vote of 7–1. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision in part, reversed or vacated it in part, and remanded the case. Justice Byron R. White wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Antitrust” in the Economic Activity area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
392 U.S. 481 · 88 S. Ct. 2224 · 20 L. Ed. 2d 1231 · 1968 U.S. LEXIS 3147
Docket number
335
Decided
June 17, 1968
Argued
March 5, 1968
Court era
Warren Court
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Affirmed and reversed (or vacated) in part and remanded
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
7–1
Majority opinion
Byron R. White
Opinion assigned by
Earl Warren
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Issue (SCDB)
Antitrust
Legal provision
Clayton Act
Type of law
Federal statute
Decision direction (SCDB)
Liberal what this means

How the Justices voted

Did not participate: Thurgood Marshall.

Full case caption

Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe Machinery Corp.

SCDB identifiers: case 1967-182, docket 1967-182-01.

Other cases on “Antitrust”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: Clayton Act

Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error