Federal Express Corporation v. Paul Holowecki
552 U.S. 389 · Decided February 27, 2008 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
Federal Express Corporation v. Paul Holowecki was decided on February 27, 2008 by a vote of 7–2. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Anthony M. Kennedy wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Employment discrimination (race, age, religion, illegitimacy, national origin, working conditions)” in the Civil Rights area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 552 U.S. 389 · 128 S. Ct. 1147 · 170 L. Ed. 2d 10 · 2008 U.S. LEXIS 2196
- Docket number
- 06-1322
- Decided
- February 27, 2008
- Argued
- November 6, 2007
- Court era
- Roberts Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 7–2
- Majority opinion
- Anthony M. Kennedy
- Opinion assigned by
- John G. Roberts Jr.
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Employment discrimination (race, age, religion, illegitimacy, national origin, working conditions)
- Issue area
- Civil Rights
- Legal provision
- Age Discrimination in Employment Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority | |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Dissent | |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice David H. Souter | Majority | |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Majority | |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Majority | |
| Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. | Majority |
Full case caption
Federal Express Corporation v. Paul Holowecki, et Al
SCDB identifiers: case 2007-021, docket 2007-021-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Employment discrimination (race, age, religion, illegitimacy, national origin, working conditions)”
- Sprint/united Management Company v. Ellen Mendelsohn
- CBOCS West, Inc. v. Hedrick G. Humphries
- Myrna Gomez-Perez v. John E. Potter
- Anup Engquist v. Oregon Department of Agriculture
- Meacham v. Knolls Atomic Power Lab.
- Ky. Ret. Sys. v. EEOC
Cases on the same legal provision: Age Discrimination in Employment Act
- J. Daniel Kimel, Jr. v. Florida Board of RegentsLaw held unconstitutional
- Christine McKennon v. Nashville Banner Publishing Company
- Robert D. Gilmer v. Interstate/johnson Lane Corporation
- Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. Richard Sperling
- Lehman v. Nakshian
- Lorillard v. Pons
Same Term, same area (Civil Rights)
- Board of Education of the City School District of the City of New York v. Tom F.
- Sprint/united Management Company v. Ellen Mendelsohn
- Washington State Grange v. Washington State Republican Party
- Allen Snyder v. Louisiana
- William Crawford v. Marion County Election Board
- Bob Riley v. Yvonne Kennedy
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error