Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Michael Broudo
544 U.S. 336 · Decided April 19, 2005 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Michael Broudo was decided on April 19, 2005 unanimously (9–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Stephen G. Breyer wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Securities regulation” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 544 U.S. 336 · 125 S. Ct. 1627 · 161 L. Ed. 2d 577 · 2005 U.S. LEXIS 3478
- Docket number
- 03-932
- Decided
- April 19, 2005
- Argued
- January 12, 2005
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- Stephen G. Breyer
- Opinion assigned by
- William H. Rehnquist
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Securities regulation
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Securities Act of 1933, Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or Williams Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority | |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority | |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Majority | |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | |
| Justice David H. Souter | Majority | |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Majority | |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Majority | |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
Full case caption
Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al. v. Michael Broudo et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 2004-040, docket 2004-040-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Securities regulation”
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. Charles E. Edwards
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.
- Stoneridge Investment Partners, LLC v. Scientific-Atlanta, Inc.
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. Charles Zandford
- The Wharf (Holdings) Limited v. United International Holdings, Inc.
- Jerry N. Jones v. Harris Associates L. P.
Cases on the same legal provision: Securities Act of 1933, Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or Williams Act
- Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC v. Glen Billing
- Ed Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc.Law held unconstitutional
- Merrill Lynch v. Manning
- Salman v. United States
- Cal Public Employees' Retirement Sys. v. Anz Securities
- Keith R. Gollust v. Ira L. Mendell, Etc.
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Norfolk Southern Railway Company v. James N. Kirby
- Koons Buick Pontiac GMC, Inc. v. Bradley Nigh
- Kp Permanent Make-Up, Inc. v. Lasting Impression I, Inc.
- Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Aviall Services, Inc.
- Rochelle Brosseau v. Kenneth J. Haugen
- Willard Stewart v. Dutra Construction Company
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error