CaseTrail

Norfolk Southern Railway Company v. James N. Kirby

543 U.S. 14 · Decided November 9, 2004 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Norfolk Southern Railway Company v. James N. Kirby was decided on November 9, 2004 unanimously (9–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Sandra Day O'Connor wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Liability, miscellaneous” in the Economic Activity area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
543 U.S. 14 · 125 S. Ct. 385 · 160 L. Ed. 2d 283 · 2004 U.S. LEXIS 7510
Docket number
02-1028
Decided
November 9, 2004
Argued
October 6, 2004
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Reversed and remanded
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
9–0 (unanimous)
Majority opinion
Sandra Day O'Connor
Opinion assigned by
William H. Rehnquist
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Decision direction (SCDB)
Conservative what this means

How the Justices voted

Full case caption

Norfolk Southern Railway Company v. James N. Kirby, Pty Ltd., Dba Kirby Engineering, and Allianz Australia Insurance Limited

SCDB identifiers: case 2004-002, docket 2004-002-01.

Other cases on “Liability, miscellaneous”

See all

Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error