Smith v. Phillips
455 U.S. 209 · Decided January 25, 1982 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Smith v. Phillips was decided on January 25, 1982 by a vote of 6–3. The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice William H. Rehnquist wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Due process, impartial decision maker” in the Due Process area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 455 U.S. 209 · 102 S. Ct. 940 · 71 L. Ed. 2d 78 · 1982 U.S. LEXIS 69
- Docket number
- 80-1082
- Decided
- January 25, 1982
- Argued
- November 9, 1981
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 6–3
- Majority opinion
- William H. Rehnquist
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Due process, impartial decision maker
- Issue area
- Due Process
- Legal provision
- Fourteenth Amendment (due process)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Dissent | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Dissent | |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
Full case caption
Smith, Correctional Superintendent v. Phillips
SCDB identifiers: case 1981-038, docket 1981-038-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Due process, impartial decision maker”
- Schweiker v. McClure
- United States v. Raddatz
- Marshall v. Jerrico, Inc.
- Aetna Life Insurance Co. v. Lavoie
- Connally v. GeorgiaLaw held unconstitutional
- Hortonville Joint School District No. 1 v. Hortonville Education Assn.
Cases on the same legal provision: Fourteenth Amendment (due process)
- City of Mesquite v. Aladdin's Castle, Inc.
- Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co.
- Santosky v. KramerLaw held unconstitutional
- Jago v. Van Curen
- Greene v. LindseyLaw held unconstitutional
- Insurance Corporation of Ireland, Ltd. v. Compagnie Des Bauxites de Guinee
Same Term, same area (Due Process)
- Jago v. Van Curen
- Texaco, Inc. v. Short
- City of Mesquite v. Aladdin's Castle, Inc.
- Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co.
- Schweiker v. McClure
- Greene v. LindseyLaw held unconstitutional
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error