Susan B. Anthony List v. Driehaus
573 U.S. 149 · Decided June 16, 2014 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Susan B. Anthony List v. Driehaus was decided on June 16, 2014 unanimously (9–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Clarence Thomas wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Standing, direct injury” in the Judicial Power area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 573 U.S. 149 · 134 S. Ct. 2334 · 189 L. Ed. 2d 246 · 2014 U.S. LEXIS 4169
- Docket number
- 13-193
- Decided
- June 16, 2014
- Argued
- April 22, 2014
- Court era
- Roberts Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- Clarence Thomas
- Opinion assigned by
- John G. Roberts Jr.
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Standing, direct injury
- Issue area
- Judicial Power
- Legal provision
- Article III, Section 2, Paragraph 1 (case or controversy requirement)
- Type of law
- Constitution
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Majority | |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Majority | |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Majority | |
| Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Sonia Sotomayor | Majority | |
| Justice Elena Kagan | Majority |
Full case caption
Susan B. Anthony List v. Driehaus
SCDB identifiers: case 2013-060, docket 2013-060-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Standing, direct injury”
- James R. Clapper, Jr. v. Amnesty International USA
- Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins
- Carol Anne Bond v. United StatesAltered precedent
- Arizona Christian School Tuition Organization v. Kathleen M. Winn
- Gill v. Whitford
- Carney v. Adams
Cases on the same legal provision: Article III, Section 2, Paragraph 1 (case or controversy requirement)
- Hollingsworth v. Perry
- Already, LLC v. Nike, Inc.
- Campbell-Ewald Co. v. Gomez
- Americold Logistics, LLC v. Conagra Foods, Inc.
- Wittman v. Personhuballah
- Town of Chester v. Laroe Estates
Same Term, same area (Judicial Power)
- Atlantic Marine Constr. Co. v. United States Dist. Court for Western Dist. of Tex.
- Sprint Communications, Inc. v. Jacobs
- Miss. ex Rel. Hood v. Au Optronics Corp.
- Ray Haluch Gravel Co. v. Cent. Pension Fund of Int'l Union of Operating Eng'rs
- Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error