CaseTrail

William R. Pounders v. Penelope Watson

521 U.S. 982 · Decided June 27, 1997 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

William R. Pounders v. Penelope Watson was decided on June 27, 1997 by a vote of 7–2. The Court reversed the lower court's decision. The decision was issued per curiam (an unsigned opinion of the Court). SCDB classifies its main issue as “Contempt of court or Congress” in the Criminal Procedure area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
521 U.S. 982 · 117 S. Ct. 2359 · 138 L. Ed. 2d 976 · 1997 U.S. LEXIS 4045
Docket number
96-1383
Decided
June 27, 1997
Decision type
Per curiam (no oral argument)
Disposition
Reversed
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
7–2
Opinion assigned by
William H. Rehnquist
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Legal provision
Fourteenth Amendment (due process)
Type of law
Constitutional amendment
Decision direction (SCDB)
Conservative what this means

How the Justices voted

Full case caption

William R. Pounders, Judge, Superior Court of California, Los Angeles County v. Penelope Watson

SCDB identifiers: case 1996-097, docket 1996-097-01.

Other cases on “Contempt of court or Congress”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: Fourteenth Amendment (due process)

Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error