United States v. Wilson
421 U.S. 309 · Decided May 19, 1975 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
United States v. Wilson was decided on May 19, 1975 by a vote of 6–3. The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Chief Justice Warren E. Burger wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Contempt of court or Congress” in the Criminal Procedure area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 421 U.S. 309 · 95 S. Ct. 1802 · 44 L. Ed. 2d 186 · 1975 U.S. LEXIS 61
- Docket number
- 73-1162
- Decided
- May 19, 1975
- Argued
- December 17, 1974
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 6–3
- Majority opinion
- Warren E. Burger
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Contempt of court or Congress
- Issue area
- Criminal Procedure
- Legal provision
- Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure
- Type of law
- Court rules
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William O. Douglas | Dissent | |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Dissent | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Concurrence |
Full case caption
United States v. Wilson et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1974-093, docket 1974-093-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Contempt of court or Congress”
- Maness v. Meyers
- Codispoti v. Pennsylvania
- Eaton v. City of Tulsa
- In re Little
- Johnson v. Mississippi
- Mayberry v. Pennsylvania
Cases on the same legal provision: Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure
- Rogers v. United States
- Taylor v. United States
- Davis v. United States
- Douglas Oil Company of California v. Petrol Stops Northwest
- United States v. Timmreck
- Halliday v. United States
Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)
- Ring v. United States
- Francisco v. Gathright
- Maness v. Meyers
- Test v. United States
- Daniel v. Louisiana
- Gerstein v. Pugh
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error