Hicks v. Feiock
485 U.S. 624 · Decided April 27, 1988 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
Hicks v. Feiock was decided on April 27, 1988 by a vote of 5–3. The Court vacated the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Byron R. White wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Contempt of court or Congress” in the Criminal Procedure area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 485 U.S. 624 · 108 S. Ct. 1423 · 99 L. Ed. 2d 721 · 1988 U.S. LEXIS 1985
- Docket number
- 86-787
- Decided
- April 27, 1988
- Argued
- December 1, 1987
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Vacated and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 5–3
- Majority opinion
- Byron R. White
- Opinion assigned by
- William J. Brennan Jr.
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Contempt of court or Congress
- Issue area
- Criminal Procedure
- Legal provision
- Fourteenth Amendment (due process)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Dissent | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority | |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Dissent |
Did not participate: Anthony M. Kennedy.
Full case caption
Hicks, District Attorney for County of Orange, California, Acting on Behalf of Feiock v. Feiock
SCDB identifiers: case 1987-068, docket 1987-068-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Contempt of court or Congress”
- Young v. United States ex Rel. Vuitton et Fils S. A.
- International Union v. John L. Bagwell
- William R. Pounders v. Penelope Watson
- United States v. Wilson
- Maness v. Meyers
- Codispoti v. Pennsylvania
Cases on the same legal provision: Fourteenth Amendment (due process)
- Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc. v. Joanne PopeLaw held unconstitutional
- R. 'roy' Peralta v. Heights Medical Center, Inc.
- Arizona v. Youngblood
- National Collegiate Athletic Association v. Jerry Tarkanian
- Deshaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services
- Greer v. Miller
Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)
- Carpenter v. United States
- Yates v. Aiken
- Lowenfield v. Phelps
- Taylor v. Illinois
- United States v. Owens
- United States v. Thomas O. Robinson, Jr.
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error