CaseTrail

Hicks v. Feiock

485 U.S. 624 · Decided April 27, 1988 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Hicks v. Feiock was decided on April 27, 1988 by a vote of 5–3. The Court vacated the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Byron R. White wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Contempt of court or Congress” in the Criminal Procedure area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
485 U.S. 624 · 108 S. Ct. 1423 · 99 L. Ed. 2d 721 · 1988 U.S. LEXIS 1985
Docket number
86-787
Decided
April 27, 1988
Argued
December 1, 1987
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Vacated and remanded
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
5–3
Majority opinion
Byron R. White
Opinion assigned by
William J. Brennan Jr.
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Legal provision
Fourteenth Amendment (due process)
Type of law
Constitutional amendment
Decision direction (SCDB)
Liberal what this means

How the Justices voted

Did not participate: Anthony M. Kennedy.

Full case caption

Hicks, District Attorney for County of Orange, California, Acting on Behalf of Feiock v. Feiock

SCDB identifiers: case 1987-068, docket 1987-068-01.

Other cases on “Contempt of court or Congress”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: Fourteenth Amendment (due process)

Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error