United States v. Line Material Co.
333 U.S. 287 · Decided March 8, 1948 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
United States v. Line Material Co. was decided on March 8, 1948 by a vote of 5–3. The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Stanley F. Reed wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Antitrust” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 333 U.S. 287 · 68 S. Ct. 550 · 92 L. Ed. 2d 701 · 1948 U.S. LEXIS 2732
- Docket number
- 8
- Decided
- March 8, 1948
- Argued
- April 29, 1947
- Reargued
- November 12, 1947
- Court era
- Vinson Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 5–3
- Majority opinion
- Stanley F. Reed
- Opinion assigned by
- Hugo L. Black
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- Antitrust
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Sherman Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Hugo L. Black | Concurrence | |
| Justice Stanley F. Reed | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Felix Frankfurter | Dissent | |
| Justice William O. Douglas | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Frank Murphy | Concurrence | |
| Justice Wiley B. Rutledge | Concurrence | |
| Justice Harold H. Burton | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Chief Justice Fred M. Vinson | Dissent |
Did not participate: Robert H. Jackson.
Full case caption
United States v. Line Material Co. et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1947-049, docket 1947-049-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Antitrust”
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.
- United States v. Scophony Corporation of America
- Federal Trade Commission v. Morton Salt Co.
- United States v. Griffith
- Schine Chain Theatres, Inc. v. United States
- United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.
Cases on the same legal provision: Sherman Act
- United States v. Columbia Steel Co.
- United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America v. United States
- United States v. Employing Plasterers Association of Chicago
- United States v. Employing Lathers Association of Chicago and Vicinity
- International Boxing Club of New York, Inc. v. United States
- Los Angeles Meat & Provision Drivers Union v. United States
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Federal Crop Insurance Corp. v. Merrill
- International Salt Co., Inc. v. United States
- Priebe & Sons, Inc. v. United States
- Lillie v. Thompson
- Aero Mayflower Transit Co. v. Board of Railroad Commissioners of Montana
- Callen v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co.
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error